MENU

Social Channels

SEARCH ARCHIVE

  • Type

  • Topic

  • Sort

Villagers transplant and water rice fields in Huai'an City, Jiangsu Province.
Villagers transplant and water rice fields in Huai'an City, Jiangsu Province. Credit: IC photo
CHINA POLICY
24 August 202312:05

Q&A: How is climate change affecting China’s cropland?

Wanyuan Song

08.24.23

Wanyuan Song

24.08.2023 | 12:05pm
China Policy Q&A: How is climate change affecting China’s cropland?

Chinese agriculture has not had an easy year.

Official datashows that at least 1.9m hectares (19,000km2) or 8% of wheat land in China have been affected by a sustained spate of rains – with “agricultural challenges” set tocontinuethroughout the rest of the year.

The UN’sIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) andWorld Bankboth stress that further loss and damage is expected across China’s farming sector as global temperatures continue to rise.

But what, specifically, is happening to China’s arable land? And how does China plan to minimise the negative impacts of climate change on its widerfood system?

In this Q&A, Carbon Brief looks at China’s cropland policies.

What challenges does Chinese farming face under climate change?

In 2022, China suffered from its worstheatwave and droughtinsix decades. The ministry of agriculture and rural affairsstatedat a press conference last August that the agricultural sector was facing “growing risks” as a result of extreme weather and shifting planting conditions brought about by climate change.

This summer, severe drought continued to affect China in June and July, while a torrent of floods brought on by typhoons followed in August. The heavy rains havedestroyed corn and rice cropsin north China, while in central China’sHenan provincemore than 20m tonnes of wheat were lost in June alone.

Although the agriculture ministryinsists这个国家经历了“夏季收获”,the summer’s grain output decreased 2.55bnjin(1.53吨)从去年的total of 147m tonnes.

However, the US department of agriculturepredictsthat 2023 may not end up being a poor harvest year for China. Only sunflower seeds, barley and cotton are likely to see a reduction in production. The output of main crops, including corn, rice and wheat, would surpass the average output of the past five years.

Corey Lesk, research associate from the geography department atDartmouth Collegein the US, tells Carbon Brief that “in some sense, China’s crops are not that vulnerable to climate warming”.

Broadly, China’s main food crops are wheat in the north and rice in the south. “The south is already warm and sub-tropical,” says Lesk, “[and rice] is well-understood to be more resilient to extreme heat”.

In the north, Lesk says warming will lengthen the growing season and increase yield potential for wheat as well as enable farmers to “plant multiple crops” in a single year at a higher latitude. “Combining these effects, in the north, crop models show only small yield losses under plausible warming scenarios,” he adds.

Haishun Yang, an associate professor from the department of agronomy and horticulture at theUniversity of Nebraska – Lincoln, shares a similar view:

“Globally speaking, crop yield per ground area as well as the total crop production have been increasing constantly along with the climate change. China is the same as most parts of the world.”

However, Lesk warns that “there are caveats”. He says: “Those crop models are known to not realistically simulate the impact of heat extremes, in particular, so likely underestimate true impacts [of climate change].”

The most recentIPCC reporthas “high confidence” that, globally, “climate-related extremes have affected the productivity of all agricultural and fishery sectors, with negative consequences for food security and livelihoods”. China is no exception.

Dr Zhang Hongzhou, research fellow fromNanyang Technological University, Singapore, tells Carbon Brief:

“More occurrences of extreme climate events, such as flood, drought and typhoon, will certainly present major risks to the country’s [China] food security both in the short term and long term.”

“While certain regions or crops might benefit from a warm climate, based on existing studies, the overall impact seems to be negative. In short, climate change is a major threat to the country’s [China’s] food security.”

What impact will climate change have on China’s food security?

A study published earlier this year inNaturefound that extreme rainfall has suppressed Chinese rice yields by around 8% over the past two decades. A review of hundreds of studies, published in the journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, concluded that rice yields in China were likely to decline by 5-25% after the 2060s.

China’sthird national assessment reportwritten by the ministry of ecology and environment in 2018 already acknowledged the negative consequences. It said:

“Climate change has significantly impacted cropping systems in China, as well as the occurrence, development and damage caused by disease and pests, and the growth, development and yield of crops.”

The report also said that climate change would bring less reliable rains, the spread of dangerous pests and shorter growing seasons for many crops.

Meanwhile, Lesk tells Carbon Brief that climate change directly threatens the farming of pork – China’s most consumed meat by volume.

China consumes about 45% of the world’s pork at more than double the world’s average per capita consumption. (See more on Carbon Brief’s analysis onChina’s food system).

Lesk says pork in China is “very dependent” on soya beans, which accounts for up to 90% of a pig’s feed. Soya beans, although mostly imported from the Americas, are “quite vulnerable to future extremes”.

Lesk thinks that “while the climate risk to China’s own crops is perhaps somewhat lower than other countries, its exposure to distant risks is quite high in this respect”.

Tang Renjian, China’s minister of agriculture and rural affairs, hasstatedthat the Chinese population needs 700,000 tonnes of grain, 98,000 tonnes of edible oil, 1.92m tonnes of vegetables and 230,000 tonnes of meat on a daily basis.

This means the nation’s “cultivated land must be kept at 1.8bnmu(about 120m hectares), which is the bottom line and cannot be lowered” to meet such demand, he said.

So, does China have enough cultivated land?

How much arable land does China have?

The Chinese governmentclaimsthat China had 127.6m hectares of arable land at the end of 2022, which is about9%of the world’stotal.

The most recentdatafrom the Food and Agriculture Organisation shows that China’s arable land remained at around 119m hectares (12% of its land area) between 2012 to 2020, which is smaller than theChinese official data, which shows 128m hectares, as of 31 December 2019.

As the chart below shows, the area of cultivated land has slowly decreased over the past 10 years, after seeing a rapid increase in the 1980s in line with China’s economic reform in the农村是as. The Chinese ministry of agriculture and rural affairsannounceda loss of 113mmu(7.5m hectares) in the summer of 2021.

Change of arable land in China in hectares from 1961–2020.
Change of arable land in China in hectares from 1961–2020. Source:FAO.

Theofficial explanationfor the loss is “mainly due to agricultural structural adjustment and afforestation” – 7.4m hectares became forest land and 4.2m hectares were turned into gardens from 2011 to 2021, says the government.

Data from theFAOalso shows that forest cover in China grew 17.4m hectares from 2011-20.

(Astudyby Chinese academics in 2014 found that urbanisation led to a decrease of arable lands.Pollutionand theheavy useoffertilisershave also contributed to the loss of farmland.)

However, theGuide to Chinese Climate Policy 2022牛津能源研究所发表的钉ies, raised doubt about the accuracy of the official statistics. It says that China’s “forest” cover is larger than the area of “forest” defined internationally due to the “systemic over-reporting of tree cover”.Global Forest Watch, an NGO, also says that, from 2013 to 2021, China lost 3.7m hectares of natural forest – a 2.7% decrease.

Yang tells Carbon Brief that “the balance between food security and forestry is tricky”. He adds:

“Food security is a tangible and rigid attribute, whereas forestry is a soft and elastic one…After satisfying all basic land uses (residential, transportation, etc), forestry should be promoted as a way to improve ecosystem quality and sustainability.”

The government remains typically upbeat. In 2009, the Chinese governmentannouncedit had “solved the problem of food”. Chinese president Xi Jinpingsaidin 2023 that China’s new mission is to build “a beautiful China”, which “features harmony between human and nature”.

So how does China plan to maintain – or even increase – forests while feeding its 1.4 billion people?

How will China balance food security with forestry and renewable energy?

China has made the “Sannong” policy (meaning agriculture, rural areas and farmers) thecoreof its agriculture policy. Since 2004, China’s annual “No. 1 central document” – the first and, arguably, the most important policy statement – has been related to food security. The government drew a protective “红线” around 1.8bmu(about 120m hectares) of arable land in 2006 to ensure food security.

In 2023, theNo.1document says the country needs to “ensure the national grain output remains above 1.3tnjin(780m tonnes)”. Also in 2023, the ministry of natural resourcesreiteratedthat “China will strictly stick to a ‘red line’ on the size of arable land the country owns”.

Yang argues that “enough food” is a “hard goal”. He adds: “If China simply needs more food and can’t acquire the deficit from outside, it has to use all the resources to make it.”

China recently revised theland management lawand issued a noticestrictly controlling farmland use, as well as requiring that “permanent basic farmland” not be converted to other land, such as forest land.

If farmland were to be transferred, it needs to follow twoprinciples:“jin chu ping heng”(striking a balance between land “outflow” and “inflow”); and“zhan bu ping heng”(striking a balance between land occupation and compensation). The two principles aim to keep the overall amount of arable land and forest land unchanged.

Yang tells Carbon Brief:

“For the balance between land occupation and compensation, we would fool ourselves if we compensate for the area of occupied land. What we need to compensate [for] is the lost crop output capacity.

If we have to maintain the crop output capacity, we need to convert other lands (e.g. forest or grassland) into crop production. Usually, especially in China, the crop’s natural yield (i.e. without resource and technology investments) of other lands is lower than current crop lands. The same area of newly converted lands will have lower crop output capacity than the occupied lands. We must either convert more other lands, or invest accordingly, e.g. in irrigation, land levelling and soil fertility to fully compensate [for] the lost crop output capacity.”

Zhang also points out the need for investment in other related fields:

“In order to strike a balance between food security and sustainability, China needs to better utilise international trade, more investments [in] agricultural tech, and in foreign agricultural diversified trade, better global food governance.”

Additionally, China’s currentpolicyencourages construction, including solar farms, to be built on unused land, such as the deserts in the far west.

New construction and expansion of the solar projects “shall not occupy permanent basic farmland, basic grassland, ‘class I’ protected forest land, and key state-owned forest areas”, stresses the document.

Sharelines from this story
  • Q&A: How is climate change affecting China’s cropland?

Expert analysis direct to your inbox.

Get a round-up of all the important articles and papers selected by Carbon Brief by email. Find out more about our newslettershere.