MENU

Social Channels

SEARCH ARCHIVE

  • Type

  • Topic

  • Sort

Tunghsiao Power Plant, a gas fired power plant in Miaoli, Taiwan.
Tunghsiao Power Plant in Miaoli, Taiwan. Credit: Jui-Chi Chan / Alamy Stock Photo
INTERNATIONAL POLICY
20 September 202315:44

帖子:新的石油和天然气发电厂的计划have grown by 13% in 2023

Multiple Authors

09.20.23
International policy 帖子:新的石油和天然气发电厂的计划have grown by 13% in 2023

The global energy crisis, driven by surging gas prices, hasdecisively dentedthe prospects for the fuel’s future growth.

As a result, the “golden age of gas” predicted by theInternational Energy Agency(IEA) in 2011 is “nearing an end”,saysthe agency’s chief Dr Fatih Birol, with gas now set to peak by 2030.

Countries around the world are turning away from gas ashigh and volatileprices make the fossil fuel less economical, while the costs of alternativesdecline.

Yet plans for new oil- and gas-fired power plants actually grew by 13% last year, especially in China and Southeast Asia, according to our newreportatGlobal Energy Monitor(GEM).

Our tracking shows there is now 783 gigawatts (GW) of oil- and gas-power capacity under development – projects that are either announced or in the pre-construction and construction phases. These represent a stranded asset risk of hundreds of billions of dollars and potentially locking in tens of billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

The overwhelming majority of this capacity is gas-fired plants, with only 7.5GW of exclusively oil-fired power plants in development.

If these new fossil-fueled power stations are completed and become operational, they could divert resources from more cost-effective and lower-carbon alternatives.

Globally widespread development

In the year to July 2023, the capacity of oil- and gas-fired power stations under development around the world grew by 90GW (13%), reaching a total of 783GW, according to the latest figures from GEM’sGlobal Oil and Gas Plant Tracker(GOGPT).

(Projects “under development” are those that have been announced or are in the pre-construction and construction phases, but are not yet operating.)

If they are all built, these projects would grow the capacity of the global oil and gas power fleet by a third, at an estimated cost of $611bn in capital expenditure, our analysis shows.

We also found that these plants would emit more carbon dioxide (CO2) in their lifetimes than theUS generatesin six-and-a-half years – some 41bn tonnes of CO2 equivalent – if they were operated in line with historical averages.

To date, only a quarter of the 783GW of capacity under development is already being built, shaded dark brown in the figure below, with the remainder being in the pre-construction (mid-brown) or early phase of development (“announced”, orange).

As the chart shows, the top 10 countries for planned new gas- and oil-fired capacity are spread across four different continents: Asia, North America, South America and Africa.

Chart: A quarter of oil and gas plants in development are in construction.

Every region of the world has significant quantities of new oil and gas-fired power in development, as shown in the chart below. However, the largest concentration is in Asia, which is home to 514GW – some two-thirds of the global total.

Chart: Where are oil and gas plants in development.

Asia leads gas expansion

About two-thirds of global gas- and oil-fired electricity generating capacity in development is located in Asia, according to our analysis.

Countries in east and south-east Asia are pursuing plans to either begin importing liquified natural gas (LNG) or expand domestic production, while western Asia (which includes many Middle Eastern nations) continues its long-standing reliance on gas-fired powergenerationto meet its energy needs.

(GEM refers to the United Nations’ geoscheme for western Asia, which includes: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Cyprus, Georgia, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Türkiye, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.)

Globally, China leads the development of new gas power capacity, with 21% of the world’s total under development and the largest increase compared to last year, we found.

The distribution of oil- (black), dual-fuel (orange) and gas-fired power plants (yellow) across Asia is shown in the map below. Operating sites are shown with a closed circle while those under construction are dashed and those in earlier stages of development open.

Locations of oil- (black), dual-fuel (orange) and gas-fired (yellow) power developments in the Middle East and Asia.
Locations of oil- (black), dual-fuel (orange) and gas-fired (yellow) power developments in the Middle East and Asia. The size of each circle is proportional to the project capacity. Each location’s outline indicates its current status as already operating (solid line), under construction (dashed) or in earlier stages of development (open). Source: GEM.

Transition risks

The key drivers of the push to increase gas power capacity include energy security, rising energy demand and theincreasingly questionedidea of gas as a “transition” fuel, our analysis shows, while arguments around thestabilityof electricity grids appear to have receded.

Nevertheless, the volatility in gas prices haspushedcountries such as Pakistan and Bangladesh away from reliance on imported LNG, with supplies of the fuel likely to remain tight for several more years, according to theIEA.

At the same time, the fragility of the fossil-fuel system in the face of extreme weather events has been on display this year.

In the Middle East, for example, gas turbinesbuckled北极气温升高,而爆炸parts of the US causedpower outages as coal and gas plants broke down.

Within our totals there are nearly 98GW of coal-to-gas conversions or replacements under development globally, more than 60% of which is in Asia, our latest figures show.

This is despite the fact that shifting directly from coal to low-carbon electricity would, in many cases, be cheaper than shifting to gas. TheTransitionZerocoal-to-clean price index” shows that solar or wind with storage is cheaper than gas power in China, for example.

In general, expanding oil- and gas-fired electricity generating capacity creates a potentially costlystranded asset risk, as new infrastructure may end up as a liability before the end of its anticipated economic lifetime, GEM’s analysis suggests.

This is because many gas and oil plants would need to operate limited hours or retire before they complete their full life span, if global climate targets are to be met.

Furthermore, oil and gas power expansion could divert resources away from the transition to low-carbon energy supplies. According to the IEA, global renewable energy needs totriple by 2030to keep the world on track for 1.5C of warming by 2030.

Over the past year, renewables became even morecost-competitive, despite inflationary pressures, because gas costs rose even faster.

Sharelines from this story
  • 帖子:新的石油和天然气发电厂的计划have grown by 13% in 2023

Expert analysis direct to your inbox.

Get a round-up of all the important articles and papers selected by Carbon Brief by email. Find out more about our newslettershere.